North Carolina heat wave risk
Wake County has the highest heat wave risk in North Carolina, scoring 96.9 out of 100 — rated "Relatively High" by FEMA's National Risk Index. Recorded heat wave events across North Carolina have increased 971% over the past five years compared to the prior five-year period.
| # | County | NRI score | Rating |
NOAA events 2016–2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wake County | 96.9 | Relatively High | 5 |
| 2 | Mecklenburg County | 94.3 | Relatively Moderate | 0 |
| 3 | Cumberland County | 94.2 | Relatively Moderate | 5 |
| 4 | Durham County | 94 | Relatively Moderate | 5 |
| 5 | Johnston County | 89.9 | Relatively Moderate | 5 |
| 6 | Robeson County | 89 | Relatively Moderate | 0 |
| 7 | Pitt County | 88.1 | Relatively Moderate | 4 |
| 8 | Wayne County | 87.8 | Relatively Moderate | 5 |
| 9 | Onslow County | 87.5 | Relatively Moderate | 9 |
| 10 | Guilford County | 87 | Relatively Moderate | 0 |
| 11 | Columbus County | 86.2 | Relatively Moderate | 0 |
| 12 | New Hanover County | 85.6 | Relatively Moderate | 0 |
| 13 | Brunswick County | 84.9 | Relatively Moderate | 0 |
| 14 | Craven County | 84.2 | Relatively Moderate | 8 |
| 15 | Orange County | 84.1 | Relatively Moderate | 5 |
| 16 | Nash County | 83.9 | Relatively Moderate | 5 |
| 17 | Harnett County | 83.5 | Relatively Moderate | 5 |
| 18 | Forsyth County | 80.3 | Relatively Moderate | 0 |
| 19 | Wilson County | 80.1 | Relatively Moderate | 5 |
| 20 | Sampson County | 79.1 | Relatively Moderate | 5 |
| 21 | Moore County | 76.8 | Relatively Low | 3 |
| 22 | Lenoir County | 76.1 | Relatively Low | 3 |
| 23 | Duplin County | 75.3 | Relatively Low | 3 |
| 24 | Halifax County | 75 | Relatively Low | 5 |
| 25 | Edgecombe County | 74.4 | Relatively Low | 5 |
| 26 | Alamance County | 73.8 | Relatively Low | 3 |
| 27 | Hoke County | 73.1 | Relatively Low | 3 |
| 28 | Chatham County | 72.4 | Relatively Low | 5 |
| 29 | Lee County | 72.2 | Relatively Low | 5 |
| 30 | Union County | 72.2 | Relatively Low | 0 |
| 31 | Scotland County | 71.6 | Relatively Low | 3 |
| 32 | Carteret County | 71 | Relatively Low | 6 |
| 33 | Beaufort County | 70.8 | Relatively Low | 7 |
| 34 | Granville County | 70.5 | Relatively Low | 2 |
| 35 | Gaston County | 68.3 | Relatively Low | 0 |
| 36 | Cabarrus County | 68.2 | Relatively Low | 0 |
| 37 | Franklin County | 67.7 | Relatively Low | 5 |
| 38 | Person County | 66.4 | Relatively Low | 2 |
| 39 | Vance County | 65.9 | Relatively Low | 2 |
| 40 | Bladen County | 65.6 | Relatively Low | 0 |
| 41 | Burke County | 65.3 | Relatively Low | 0 |
| 42 | Randolph County | 65.2 | Relatively Low | 0 |
| 43 | Richmond County | 64.9 | Relatively Low | 3 |
| 44 | Davidson County | 64.5 | Relatively Low | 0 |
| 45 | Chowan County | 64 | Relatively Low | 3 |
| 46 | Pender County | 62.9 | Relatively Low | 0 |
| 47 | Hertford County | 62.4 | Relatively Low | 2 |
| 48 | Pasquotank County | 60.8 | Relatively Low | 1 |
| 49 | Bertie County | 60.3 | Relatively Low | 2 |
| 50 | Stanly County | 58.1 | Relatively Low | 0 |
| 51 | Catawba County | 57.3 | Relatively Low | 0 |
| 52 | Greene County | 56.7 | Relatively Low | 4 |
| 53 | Martin County | 56.7 | Relatively Low | 4 |
| 54 | Rockingham County | 55.2 | Relatively Low | 0 |
| 55 | Cleveland County | 54.6 | Relatively Low | 0 |
| 56 | Washington County | 53.9 | Relatively Low | 5 |
| 57 | Perquimans County | 53.2 | Relatively Low | 2 |
| 58 | Warren County | 51.4 | Relatively Low | 5 |
| 59 | Dare County | 51.2 | Relatively Low | 6 |
| 60 | Rowan County | 50.9 | Relatively Low | 0 |
| 61 | Northampton County | 48.9 | Relatively Low | 2 |
| 62 | Anson County | 48.1 | Relatively Low | 0 |
| 63 | Montgomery County | 46.5 | Relatively Low | 0 |
| 64 | Iredell County | 46.4 | Relatively Low | 0 |
| 65 | Pamlico County | 43.2 | Relatively Low | 5 |
| 66 | Jones County | 41.3 | Relatively Low | 5 |
| 67 | Lincoln County | 39.6 | Relatively Low | 0 |
| 68 | Caldwell County | 39.3 | Relatively Low | 0 |
| 69 | Currituck County | 38.8 | Very Low | 2 |
| 70 | Rutherford County | 38.2 | Very Low | 0 |
| 71 | Caswell County | 36.9 | Very Low | 0 |
| 72 | Davie County | 31.5 | Very Low | 0 |
| 73 | Gates County | 30.4 | Very Low | 2 |
| 74 | Hyde County | 30.2 | Very Low | 6 |
| 75 | Alexander County | 28.1 | Very Low | 0 |
| 76 | Wilkes County | 28 | Very Low | 0 |
| 77 | Tyrrell County | 27.9 | Very Low | 5 |
| 78 | Stokes County | 25.3 | Very Low | 0 |
| 79 | Camden County | 24 | Very Low | 2 |
| 80 | Surry County | 22.4 | Very Low | 0 |
| 81 | McDowell County | 21.8 | Very Low | 0 |
| 82 | Yadkin County | 19.7 | Very Low | 0 |
| 83 | Polk County | 16.5 | Very Low | 0 |
| 84 | Cherokee County | 6.5 | Very Low | 0 |
| 85 | Clay County | 4.6 | Very Low | 0 |
| 86 | Henderson County | 2.5 | Very Low | 0 |
| 87 | Transylvania County | 2.5 | Very Low | 0 |
| 88 | Buncombe County | 2.2 | Very Low | 0 |
| 89 | Jackson County | 1.9 | Very Low | 0 |
| 90 | Alleghany County | 0 | No Rating | 0 |
| 91 | Ashe County | 0 | No Rating | 0 |
| 92 | Avery County | 0 | No Rating | 0 |
| 93 | Graham County | 0 | No Rating | 0 |
| 94 | Haywood County | 0 | No Rating | 0 |
| 95 | Macon County | 0 | No Rating | 0 |
| 96 | Madison County | 0 | No Rating | 0 |
| 97 | Mitchell County | 0 | No Rating | 0 |
| 98 | Swain County | 0 | No Rating | 0 |
| 99 | Watauga County | 0 | No Rating | 0 |
| 100 | Yancey County | 0 | No Rating | 0 |
Source: FEMA National Risk Index v1.20.0, December 2025. Scores are 0–100 percentile rankings among all US counties. See the methodology page for definitions. Download the full CSV for all counties.
Heat Wave risk nationally:
Other hazard risks in North Carolina:
Frequently asked questions
What is the highest heat wave risk county in North Carolina?
Wake County, NC has the highest heat wave risk in North Carolina, with a FEMA National Risk Index score of 96.9 out of 100 (rated "Relatively High").
What causes heat wave risk in North Carolina?
Heat is consistently the leading cause of weather-related mortality in the US, yet it remains underrepresented in federal disaster declarations relative to its actual impact. High scores reflect a combination of extreme temperature exposure, population vulnerability (elderly, outdoor workers), and limited access to cooling infrastructure.