Oklahoma inland flooding risk

77 counties scored 0 rated Very High

Tulsa County has the highest inland flooding risk in Oklahoma, scoring 97.9 out of 100 — rated "Relatively High" by FEMA's National Risk Index. Recorded inland flooding events across Oklahoma have decreased 43% over the past five years compared to the prior five-year period.

# County NRI score Rating NOAA events
2016–2026
1 Tulsa County 97.9 Relatively High 124
2 Oklahoma County 97.6 Relatively High 115
3 Cleveland County 88.2 Relatively Moderate 81
4 Delaware County 86.5 Relatively Moderate 6
5 Le Flore County 84.3 Relatively Moderate 41
6 Comanche County 83.6 Relatively Moderate 54
7 Rogers County 81.4 Relatively Moderate 26
8 Ottawa County 78.2 Relatively Moderate 44
9 Muskogee County 78 Relatively Moderate 24
10 Cherokee County 77.5 Relatively Moderate 28
11 McCurtain County 75.9 Relatively Moderate 62
12 Mayes County 75.9 Relatively Moderate 16
13 Canadian County 75.7 Relatively Moderate 24
14 Osage County 75.1 Relatively Moderate 22
15 Washington County 74.2 Relatively Moderate 14
16 Sequoyah County 73.6 Relatively Moderate 27
17 Creek County 72.2 Relatively Low 11
18 Wagoner County 70.6 Relatively Low 16
19 Kay County 69.8 Relatively Low 19
20 Payne County 67.6 Relatively Low 16
21 Pottawatomie County 67.4 Relatively Low 21
22 Pittsburg County 67.1 Relatively Low 22
23 Garfield County 67 Relatively Low 24
24 Okmulgee County 66 Relatively Low 44
25 Carter County 63.4 Relatively Low 16
26 Grady County 62.7 Relatively Low 17
27 McIntosh County 59.8 Relatively Low 12
28 Adair County 59.5 Relatively Low 32
29 Craig County 55.1 Relatively Low 10
30 Garvin County 54.9 Relatively Low 29
31 Caddo County 54.5 Relatively Low 19
32 Stephens County 54.2 Relatively Low 28
33 Bryan County 54.1 Relatively Low 9
34 McClain County 53.3 Relatively Low 10
35 Logan County 50.7 Relatively Low 14
36 Lincoln County 50.4 Relatively Low 19
37 Pontotoc County 45.6 Relatively Low 33
38 Kingfisher County 40.7 Relatively Low 11
39 Latimer County 40.6 Relatively Low 4
40 Marshall County 38.8 Relatively Low 4
41 Custer County 38.7 Relatively Low 10
42 Seminole County 38.2 Relatively Low 10
43 Woodward County 36.8 Relatively Low 5
44 Pushmataha County 36.1 Relatively Low 4
45 Pawnee County 35.4 Relatively Low 15
46 Beckham County 31.8 Very Low 11
47 Murray County 31.5 Very Low 20
48 Noble County 31 Very Low 7
49 Nowata County 29 Very Low 10
50 Choctaw County 26.8 Very Low 4
51 Jackson County 25.1 Very Low 15
52 Kiowa County 22.9 Very Low 10
53 Haskell County 22.6 Very Low 4
54 Alfalfa County 22.4 Very Low 3
55 Okfuskee County 22.1 Very Low 9
56 Atoka County 20.5 Very Low 7
57 Washita County 19.8 Very Low 8
58 Johnston County 19.1 Very Low 39
59 Hughes County 17.5 Very Low 2
60 Blaine County 17.4 Very Low 3
61 Love County 14.4 Very Low 7
62 Major County 14.3 Very Low 5
63 Jefferson County 14.2 Very Low 6
64 Grant County 13.8 Very Low 8
65 Woods County 12.6 Very Low 2
66 Coal County 12.1 Very Low 12
67 Texas County 11.9 Very Low 8
68 Roger Mills County 10.4 Very Low 5
69 Ellis County 7 Very Low 1
70 Harper County 6.8 Very Low 1
71 Tillman County 6.7 Very Low 17
72 Cotton County 6.5 Very Low 2
73 Greer County 5.9 Very Low 7
74 Dewey County 5.7 Very Low 1
75 Beaver County 5.3 Very Low 9
76 Harmon County 3.8 Very Low 1
77 Cimarron County 2.9 Very Low 5

Source: FEMA National Risk Index v1.20.0, December 2025. Scores are 0–100 percentile rankings among all US counties. See the methodology page for definitions. Download the full CSV for all counties.

Inland Flooding risk nationally:

Other hazard risks in Oklahoma:

Frequently asked questions

What is the highest inland flooding risk county in Oklahoma?

Tulsa County, OK has the highest inland flooding risk in Oklahoma, with a FEMA National Risk Index score of 97.9 out of 100 (rated "Relatively High").

What causes inland flooding risk in Oklahoma?

Inland flooding covers riverine and surface (pluvial) flooding — the most common and costly natural disaster type in the US. High scores appear across river floodplains in the Midwest, South, and Mid-Atlantic, where legacy development in flood-prone areas and aging stormwater infrastructure concentrate risk.